• "Even a relatively small quantum computer, one that had a few tens of thousands of qubits, could consider so many different values at once that it would be able to break all known [ed: RSA, D&H, ECC, AES-128] codes commonly used for secure Internet communication.”

    Prof Seth Lloyd of MIT, MIT Review 2008

  • “It's not good enough to have a system where everyone (using the system) must be trusted, it must also be made robust against insiders!”

    Robert Morris, former Chief Scientist of the US National Security Agency (NSA), National Computer Security Center, "Crypto '95 invited talks by R. Morris and A. Shamir", 1995

  • “Never underestimate the attention, risk, money and time that an opponent will put into reading traffic.”

    Robert Morris, former Chief Scientist of the US National Security Agency (NSA), National Computer Security Center, "Crypto '95 invited talks by R. Morris and A. Shamir", 1995

  • "The future ability of quantum computers might be a decade or two away, their future ability to break public-key cryptography has important implications for the encryption of highly sensitive information today. For these applications, we must already design new public-key cryptosystems and one-way functions that are immune to quantum cryptanalysis."

    ARDA, Report of the Quantum Information Science and Technology Experts Panel, 2004

  • “The more complex the threats become, the more you have to do the basics and groundwork really well. Staying aware and on top of new vulnerabilities and ensuring that patches and software updates are rapidly implemented is crucial.”

    Jeff Shipley, Cisco Intelligence Collection Manager, Cisco 2008 Annual Security Report

  • "But conventional security is not enough. The complexity of today's operational environment means organisations must embrace a level of business resilience that is normally associated with the protection of critical national infrastructure."

    Detica, a BAE Systems Company

  • “Consider the use of smart cards ... for especially critical functions.  Although more costly than software, when properly implemented the assurance gain is great.  The form-factor is not as important as the existence of an isolated processor and address space for assured operations – an ‘Island of Security,’ if you will.  Such devices can communicate with each other through secure protocols and provide a web of security connecting secure nodes located across a sea of insecurity in the global net.”

    Brian Snow, Former Technical Director of the US National Security Agency (NSA), "We need assurance!", 1999-2008

  • "Some physicists predicted that within the next 10 to 20 years quantum computers will be built that are sufficiently powerful to implement Shor’s ideas and to break all existing public key schemes. Thus we need to look ahead to a future of quantum computers, and we need to prepare the cryptographic world for that future.

    Prof Seth Lloyd of MIT, MIT Review 2008

  • "Given their power to intercept and disrupt secret communications, it is not surprising that quantum computers have the attention of various U.S. government agencies.  The National Security Agency, which supports research in quantum computing, candidly declares that given its interest in keeping U.S. government communications secure, it is loath to see quantum computers built. On the other hand, if they can be built, then it wants to have the first one.”

    Prof Seth Lloyd of MIT, MIT Review 2008

  • “The current way which organisations approach security can be recognised as an underlying market failure which consists of fire fighting security problems, silo'd implementation of technologies, uncontrolled application development practices and a failure to address systemic problems. Organisations tend to deal with one problem at a time that results in the deployment of point solutions to treat singular problems. This failure is typical of an uncontrolled marketplace evolving with little or no co-ordination.

    The British Government’s Technology Strategy Board, 2008
  • “Business now relies on information infrastructures that are interlinked and interdependent… The way in which these hidden interdependencies pervade our everyday lives is staggering and, in some cases, may go unchecked for many years until an incident occurs that revels the true nature of the interdependences' impact.”

    The British Government’s Technology Strategy Board, 2008
  • The software security industry today is at about the same stage as the auto industry was in 1930" ... "it looks fast, goes nice but in an accident you die.” ... "The major shortfall is absence of assurance (or safety) mechanisms in software. If my car crashed as often as my computer does, I would be dead by now."

    Brian Snow, Former Technical Director of the US National Security Agency (NSA), "We need assurance!", 1999-2008

  • "First and foremost, there is no proper excuse for continued use of a broken cryptographic primitive (MD5) when sufficiently strong alternatives are readily available, for example SHA-2. Secondly, there is no substitute for security awareness." ... "Advice from experts should be taken seriously and early in the process. In this case, MD5 should have been phased out soon after 2004."

    Alexander Sotirov, Marc Stevens, Jacob Appelbaum, Arjen Lenstra, David Molnar, Dag Arne Osvik, Benne de Wegerr, "MD5 considered harmful today - Creating a rogue CA certificate", December 2008
Resources Security bibliography Security Organisations, Projects, and Calls bibliography: US NIST Cryptographic Key Management Project
bibliography: US NIST Cryptographic Key Management Project
Project: Cryptographic Key Management Project
About CKM Project: Cryptographic Key Management (CKM) is a fundamental part of cryptographic technology and is considered one of the most difficult aspects associated with its use. Of particular concern are the scalability of the methods used to distribute keys and the usability of these methods. NIST has undertaken an effort to improve the overall key management strategies used by the public and private sectors in order to enhance the usability of cryptographic technology, provide scalability across cryptographic technologies, and support a global cryptographic key management infrastructure.
Organisation: US National Institute of Standards and Technology
About NIST: NIST, an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, was founded in 1901 as the United States' first federal physical science research laboratory. The NIST Computer Security Division collaborates with a number of national and international agencies and standards bodies to develop secure, interoperable security standards.
Quote: This Cryptographic Key Management Workshop is the kickoff activity in a ‘leap-ahead’ effort that we are undertaking as a part of the National Cybersecurity Initiative. The President recently announced the results of a cybersecurity policy review. Cybersecurity is a critical element in our national security posture. Our reliance on the internet is becoming nearly total. When the financial crisis hit Lehman Brothers, no one was paying close attention to the fact that most of the international fund transfers were going through that institution. Suddenly that capability was lost and what was a very serious situation turned into a real crisis. The role of key management in cybersecurity is critical.”
Quote: “Key management is critical for all sensitive information processing applications. Economic prosperity is a major goal and needs information security.


A graphical table illustrating several desired properties for new CKM designs made by senior NIST staff at the 2009 CKM Workshop



Quote: The NIST Computer Security Chief, C. Barker, stressed the urgency of finding a robust solution: “We're going to accept very high risks in our research because we're going for very high payoffs. We’re not going to accept high risks in the future Internet, because we don’t want the adversaries to have high payoffs.”
Quote: “We know how to handle key management reasonably effectively for up to a million people, we need to go a couple of orders of magnitude beyond that in the relatively near future”
Dates: Started June, 2009. Currently active.
Keywords: cryptographic key management, asymmetric cryptography, quantum computers, symmetric cryptography, identifier based encryption
Website: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/key_mgmt/
Deliverables: Barker, E., Branstad, D., Chokhani, S., and Smid, M. Cryptographic key management workshop summary (final). Interagency Report 7609, National Institute of Standards and Technology, June 2009.
Available at http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/ir7609/nistir-7609.pdf
See also: DHS Global-Scale Identity Management
IEEE Key Management Summit 2010
IBE enabling ubiquitous uptake of encryption
Behavioural Trust and Identity

Last Updated on Thursday, 03 June 2010 12:18
 
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and to provide you with a better and more personal service. By continuing to use this website, you are consenting to this use. Find out more here.

image Introduction to synaptic Laboratories global cyber safety and Security status 2012 Cyber Security Technical Problems, Drivers and Incentives Video Presentation by Brian Snow

"Synaptic Laboratories is a rare company; they tackle the hard problems! Their basic approach is directly relevant to Governments and/or any commercial companies that deploy products that must function correctly in high-risk environments. They differ from most competitors in that not only do they work hard to get the concepts right, they also work very hard to assure the implementation is correct and robust as well."

Related Items